California Mandatory Arbitration Ban preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA)

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed itself and affirmed a district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction finding that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) preempted California Assembly Bill 51 (AB51). On October 10, 2019, Governor Newsom signed AB51 into law. The law purported to preclude mandatory arbitration agreements affecting rights […]

Employees Use New PAGA Tactic to Avoid Arbitration of Wage Claims

On April 8, 2020, California’s Second District Court of Appeal held that an employee who brings a lawsuit for civil penalties only under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), but does not request individual damages to recover his or her own wages, cannot be compelled to arbitrate the PAGA claim, even if the employee […]

California Supreme Court Rules that Employers May Require Employees to Arbitrate Employment Disputes Rather Than Go to Court, Even if the Arbitration Agreement Contains a Class Action Waiver

On Monday, June 23, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in the closely watched case of Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Logistics Inc.  In a 4-3 opinion, the Court finally agreed that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) permits employers to require that employees agree to resolve most employment disputes through arbitration, rather than by […]

Federal Arbitration Act Preempts California’s Broughton-Cruz Rule, Allowing Arbitration of all Claims Including Claims for Injunctive Relief

A federal district court denied a motion to compel arbitration for claims for injunctive relief under California’s unfair competition law, Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and false advertising law but granted the motion as to the other legal claims.  In its finding, the district court relied on what is known as California’s Broughton-Cruz rule, which exempts […]

Legislature Repeals Hughes Bill

On July 1, 2013, the Governor signed Assembly Bill (“AB”) 86, an education omnibus trailer bill which took effect immediately.  AB 86 repeals the “Hughes Bill” mandate imposed on Local Educational Agencies (“LEAs”) to provide specific behavioral assessments and interventions for special education students exhibiting serious behavioral problems, beyond those required under the Individuals with […]

Employee May Bring Lawsuit Against Laboratory That Negligently Performed Drug Test

Issue In Ishikawa v. Delta Airlines and LabOne, Inc., (2003 WL 22128938) the U.S. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) addressed the issues of 1) whether an employee’s negligence claim against a laboratory that performed a drug test on her urine sample is preempted by federal law, and 2) whether the lab was relieved of its […]

Local Regulation of Towing Operations Is Preempted by Federal Law

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held in Tocher v. City of Santa Ana, ___ F.3d ___, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16128 (9th Cir. 2000), that certain municipal and state regulations regarding the towing business are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1995 (FAAA), 49 U.S.C. section 14501. The City of […]